NAIRUTHYA
RAILWAY EMPLOYEES UNION
(NREU)
South Western
Railway-Reg.No.ALCB-4/DRT/TUA/3/2008-09
PRESS RELEASE ON THE EVE OF SAFETY MARCH BY LOCO
PILOTS.
HUMPI MISHASP 26 KILLED
* SPONSORED BY DIVISIONAL OPERATIONS
MANAGER?
* GROOMED BY DIVISIONAL SAFETY OFFICER,
DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL
ENGINEER?
AND
* MASTERMINDED BY DIVISIONAL RAILWAY
MANAGER?
IT’S NOT A HUMAN
FAILURE! IT’S A FAILURE ON THE PART OF BANGALORE
DIVISIONAL AUTHORITIES AND SYSTEM FAILURE!!
**********
1. The Divisional Operations Manager DID NOT
comply with RB guide lines and FAILED TO POST ADDITIONAL ASM AT PENUKONDA
STATION.
The
Joint Procedural Order issued Shri. Sri.V.K.Roy, E.D (Traffic Transportation), and
Sri. Mahesh
Kumar, ED (Signal) of the Railway Board vide their circular bearing NO. 2002/Sig/P1/1
dt. 09.07.2002 stipulate that if the line capacity utilization (MEANING DENSITY
OF TRAFFIC) has reached 85% an
Additional ASM/Group ‘C’ traffic shall be provided in ach shift for doing
multifarious work carried out by the Station Master.
The shocking revelation is that the DENSITY OF
TRAFFIC at Penukonda station is 145.13% towards Yelahanka on the one direction
and 110.3% towards Dharmavaram on the other direction. But the Divisional
Operations Manager (DOM) who is empowered to take a decision to post Additional
Station Master failed to take a decision in time and did not post Additional
Station Master RESULTING IN THE DEATH OF 26 INNOCENT PASSENGERS. Due to the non
implementation of the Railway Board Order even after one decade only one SM was
working at Penukonda at the time of accident.
Thus the SM was performing TWO STATION MASTES’ DUTY
and working under tremendous pressure. and it was very much required to post
Additional ASM at PKD. But no Additional ASM was posted to Penukonda at the time.
This is one of the prime reasons for the accident. The letter under reference
was issued in the year 2002 and even
after one decade no concrete steps were taken to ameliorate the issue. In the
adjacent Southern Railway a large number of Additional ASM posts have been
created. But in Bangalore Division and in South Western Railway NO CONCIOUS
EFFORTS WERE MADE to post Additional Station Masters till date.
2. The Divisional Operations Manager did not
post a SUPEVISOR GRADE STATION MASTER WITH SUFFICINT SERIVCE to Penukonda as
INCHARAGE STATION MASTER since May 2011 though IT IS A JUNCTION.
It
is a convention and time tested PROCEDURE followed in Indian Railways to post a
SENIOR STATION MASTER WITH SUFFICIENT SERVICEE TO BE IN CHARGE of JUNCTION
STATIONS.
Penukonda
is a Junction with trains running in THREE DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS-towards Bangalore City , towards Secunderabad and Sri Sai
Sathya Nilayam (that is Puttapparthi).
Till May 2011 one Shri.Raja Rao in the status of STATION MASTER GRADE
ONE with 33 YEARS OF SERVICE was working as INCHARGE Station Master. But he was
transferred to Hindupur during May 2011 and EVER SINCE ONE SHRI.SRINIVASA RAO
was ordered to be in charge of Penukonda. The Station Master is a inexperienced
with hardly seven years of service. And just two months back the DOM has posted
one a Station Master in the status of Station Master Grade one who has put in
less than 10 years of service in Railways.
THUS
A MAJOR JUNCTION STATION WAS LEFT TO THE CARE OF INEXPERIENCED STATION MASTERS
WITH LESS THAN TEN YEARS OF SERVICE AS STATION MASTER IN CHARGE CULMINATING IN
THE ACCIDENT AND THE DEATH OF 26 PASSENGERS.
NOT
POSTING A SENIOR STATION MASTER WITH SUFFICIENT SERVIDCE IN THE STATUS OF SM
GRADE ONE IS a serious administrative lapse committed by Divisional Operations
Manager causing the major calamity.
3. NOT DEPUTING BOOKING CLERK TO ISSUE TICKETS
IN THE NIGHT SHIFT FOR THE MUSLIM ANNUAL URS (FESTIVAL/JATHRA) BY DIVISIONAL
COMMERCIAL MANAGER LED TO THE ACCIDENT.
“The roadside station staff performing
simultaneous, operating and commercial duties get highly stressed due to role overload, role conflict
and unreasonable pressure.”
The
current accident was WELL ENUMERATED and DEFINED by Shri. Vinesh Kumar (Executive
Director/Traffic) in his circular bearing No.2002/TG/V/IO/ PA/110/CRS BC
Dt.24.05.2004. The term that has relevance is ‘ROLE CONFLICT’ which means doing
conflicting duties at a time simultaneously. The accident could have been
prevented despite the Loco Pilot passing the signal at danger had the SM/s
attention WAS NOT DIVERTED IN ISSUING TICKETS AND ANSWERING THE QUERIRS OF THE
HUNDREDS OF PILGRIMS.
Though the actual number of tickets were
not much at the material time there were hundred of passengers in the waiting
hall adjunct continuously distracting with their queries.
NOT DELEGATING A COMMERCIAL CLERK TO HANDLE
THE FAMOUS ANNUAL MUSLIM URS DEVOTEES DURING THE NIGHT TIME WAS A MAJOR CAUSE
FOR THE ACCIDENT UNLIKE THE PREVIOUS YEAR WHEN A COMMERCIAL CLERK WAS DELEGATED
TO WORK IN THE NIGHT SHIFT IN THE TICKET BOOKING COUNTER.
The
distraction caused by the pilgrims resulted in loss of concentration on the
part of the SM and he did not alter leading to a free line with the result
Humpi Express rammed into the stabled goods train on Road 2 when the Loco Pilot
of 16591 passed the Home signal of Penukonda at danger.
The SM did not receive Humpi straight to
Road 3 (that is Platform No.2) though it was free and he planned to receive it
on Platform NO.1 after the departure of 165953 express.
Penukonda has two passenger platforms
divided by one goods line that does not have a platform for passengers since it
is meant only for receiving Goods trains. When such situations arise where two
platform lines are separated by a goods line to facilitate the passengers to
traverse from one platform to the other it is essential as an amenity and
safety measures to provide a Foot
Over Bridge .
Though there was provision for a FOB in the construction plan the FOB was not
at built at Penuknoda. Earlier on a few occasions passengers had made
complaints on the SM on duty whenever the trains were received on Platform No.2
More over on that day the in between line was occupied by the Goods train and
absolutely there was no way for the passengers to come to Platform Number one
side to go to town.
Because the FOB was not built by DIVISIONAL
ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION) the SM was not inclined to signal the Humpi Express to
Platform No.2 which was free and THEREFORE NOT PROVIDING FOB IS ONE BASIC CAUSE
OF ACCIDENT. More over due to festival more children and women passengers were
expected by the train and the SM did not want to earn the wrath of the
pilgrims/devotees.
THUS NON CONSTRUCTION OF A FOB IS AN
IMPORTANT CAUSE FOR THE ACCIDENT.
On par with Para 4 is THE NON PROVISION OF
ELECTICAL LIGHTS ON ROAD 3/PLATFORM NO.2 was another important reason that made
the SM panicky to receive Humpi Express on Platform No.2 without detaining it
in the Home signal since lot of children and women pilgrims were coming from
all directions for the ANNUAL MUSLIM FESTIVAL and the non provision of lighting
on Platform No.2 was a dreaded factor and a major cause of the accident.
Consequently many times robbery had taken place whenever trains were dealt on
Rd.3/Platform No.2. Already there are complaints against the SMs for receiving
Passenger carrying trains on Platform No.2
A serious factor that shall not be lost
sight is the fact that 24 out of the 26 causality WAS CONSEQUNT ON BURN
INJURIES AND NOT DUE TO DIRECT INJURY ARISING OUT OF COLLISSION.
Thus only two died due to the collision and
heavy causality could have been not there at all if the fire hadn’t broken out
due to the spilt petrol from the two wheelers loaded in the luggage
compartment.
The causality rose high due not decanting
the petrol before loading the two wheelers and this is the major cause of
causalities being on the higher side. This deserves special attention of the
media since the lives of 24 innocent passengers could have been prevented if
two wheelers with petrol hadn’t been loaded in the luggage portion of the SLR.
G.Rajan,
Legal
Advisor, NREU.
Mob:
8861007227 & 9448293295.
0 comments:
Post a Comment