Thursday, September 24, 2015

Union leaders at TUC conference say members could vote no in referendum if PM undermines employment safeguards

Millions of trade union members could vote against the UK staying in the EU if the government waters down workers’ rights.

Leading unions at the TUC annual conference in Brighton will say on Tuesday that if David Cameron undermines employment safeguards in his renegotiation of Britain’s EU membership their members could vote no in any referendum.

Steve Turner, the TUC’s international spokesman, is to tell delegates: “We hope that Cameron’s efforts to weaken workers’ rights will fail but if they do not, we are issuing a warning to the prime minister: you will lose our members’ votes to stay in the EU, by worsening workers’ rights.”

That message was underlined by Unite’s general secretary, Len McCluskey, who said he was becoming increasingly concerned that Cameron would negotiate away workers’ rights with Europe.

“We will be looking very closely at the timing of the referendum and at what the prime minister is trying to do. If needs be we will consider calling a one-day policy conference to specifically discuss the European issue,” he said.

Union chief 'concerned' Corbyn hasn't given woman a top job

A statement by the TUC general council, released before the debate due to take place on Tuesday afternoon, said that thanks to EU directives workers enjoyed a series of rights, including limits on excessive hours, rules on work-life balance and health and safety protections.

“Working people, faced with the prospect of a Europe based on insecurity at work and flexibility on employers’ terms, will have little enthusiasm to vote and be even less likely to vote to stay in the European Union,” the statement said.

“Both the prime minister and the CBIshould note that should he succeed in further undermining British workers’ rights, pressure to put TUC resources and support in the referendum behind a vote to leave the European Union will intensify dramatically.”

The GMB leader, Sir Paul Kenny, said he could not recommend his members support measures that would weaken employment rights. “This is about treating workers as first-class citizens, not third-class citizens.”

Dave Prentis, the Unison leader, said: “If these rights are taken away, how can we support a yes vote in the referendum? We would be voting for worse rights.”

John McDonnell, Labour’s new shadow chancellor, continued to keep Labour’s option on Europe open. He said the party would wait to see what Cameron’s package of negotiations entailed “and then we will take a decision then about whether or not we need to renegotiate our own package while consulting others about the sort of reforms that we want”.

“Jeremy said clearly he wants to remain in Europe, but we want see what Cameron’s package is. That is fairly reasonable. The British people want to know that as well so we will see what Cameron comes up with.

“We are not going to give Cameron a free hand on any negotiations at all. We want to see what comes up with. At the moment it is trying to get a good Europe, a Europe that serves all our interests. I think we can do that.”

Some Labour MPs now on the backbenches believe Corbyn is a full-blooded Eurosceptic, and that he is holding an ambivalent line until he can secure unity, which may be impossible to achieve until he has seen the detail of Cameron’s deal next year.

Corbyn is also aware that he needs to win back Ukip voters, though his views on immigration may present a hurdle.

An ICM poll published on Tuesday by the no campaign showed that 43% of respondents wanted the UK to stay in the EU, compared with 40% who favoured an exit. The poll also reveals that those who favour leaving the EU are more enthusiastic about their position.

Dominic Cummings, a former Conservative adviser and a strategist with Business for Britain, said: “Roughly one third of the British public is very hostile to the EU, one third is pro-EU, a fifth wants to leave but is worried about jobs and living standards, and a fifth doesn’t know [perhaps doesn’t care].

“In the 1970s, the EEC was seen as a modernising project and connected to Britain’s recovery from basket-case status. Echoes of this were still there during the euro battle of 1999-2002. This feeling seems to have died. Focus groups … suggest that the financial crisis, the Greek euro crisis, and the migrant crisis all played an important part in changing sentiment.”



Related Posts:

  • Rail BABU's in glass house. Rail brass makes full use of second homes worth up to Rs 50, 000 in extra income By Maneesh Pandey 19 May 2013 | CBI director Ranjit Sinha may be insisting that a probe be held against RPF Association secretary genera… Read More
  • ICF sharing know how with Private players Workers against ICF sharing know-how with private players M. Dinesh Varma A Railway Board directive to the Integral Coach Factory (ICF) to share its coach manufacturing know-how free of cost with p… Read More
  • Fund crunch in Railways Fund crunch to delay railway projects in North East May 18, 2013 Agartala: Due to lack of funds, several national railway … Read More
  • A report about Railway the railways The gravy train The Railways, with an annual loss of a staggering Rs 27,000 crore, is riddled with corruption. Unless concerted efforts are made to put it b… Read More
  • Indian Labour Conference- press release. 45th Session of the Indian Labour Conference Concludes with A Resolve to Provide Universal Social Security Coverage and Assured Pension to the Entire Working Population The 45th Session of the Indian Labour Conference… Read More

0 comments:

Welcome To AILRSA....

Visitors

1167925

Admin Area

Blog Archive

AILRSA 1970 - . Powered by Blogger.

Are You Satisfied with 7th Pay commission ?

Popular Posts

Recent Posts

Text Widget

Followers

-------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------